1. Mrs. Shanahan on, among other things, the nexus between multiculturalism and 'gay rights'
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cheap-emotionalism-stymies-sensible-christian-debate-on-homosexuality/story-fn562txd-1226099272405
Labels: G.L.B.T., multiculturalism
2. It "is good" that "public opinion endorses the legal recognition of rights which arise from long-term same sex unions"?
This is an excerpt from His Eminence The Cardinal Archbishop of Sydney's weekly column in the Sydney Catholic Weekly (presumably it ran in the previous Sunday's edition of the Sydney Sunday Telegraph, too):
Labels: G.L.B.T., George Pell, marriage
3. Prof. Somerville on euthanasia
Excerpts from an interview in the Sydney Catholic Weekly:
4. A reminder of some aspects of the content and origin of Victoria's current abortion law
5. Several web-pages on an under-examined aspect of the Norway killings
The Monday after the killings, I was reading the Sydney Daily Telegraph's coverage of them, the first close reading I'd done on the matter, and I was interested to read that the alleged killer's manifesto contained mention of the Knights Templar. This made me wonder whether there might be a Masonic connection involved, and as I was surfing the web that night, visiting the blogs which I usually visit, lo and behold, there at Fr. Roberts's blog was a photo of the alleged killer in the costume of his Lodge (Swedish Rite, I've read). Here's a link to Fr. Roberts's write-up of the matter:
http://kingshipofchrist.blogspot.com/2011/07/freemason-or-crusader.html
And here are some other web-pages on the matter:
http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38323
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/anders-behring-breivik-judeo-masonic.html
Labels: Anders Breivik, Freemasons
6. "Coo-ees from the Cloister up & running again"
http://coo-eesfromthecloister.blogspot.com
(That was brought to my attention by this Cath Pews post.)
Labels: blogs
7. "Malta’s parliament legalizes divorce"
http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38305
Labels: divorce, Malta, marriage
8. Two quotations (in their original French) from Pius XII. on Church-State relations
(Any Francophone readers are welcome to submit their translations in this post's combox.)
1. From an Allocution to which this web-page refers as "Ai partecipanti al primo Congresso mondiale dell'Apostolato dei Laici (14 ottobre 1951)":
Reginaldvs Cantvar
Feast of St. John Mary Vianney, Confessor, and of Sts. Cyriacus, Largus, and Smaragdus, Martyrs, A.D. 2011
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/cheap-emotionalism-stymies-sensible-christian-debate-on-homosexuality/story-fn562txd-1226099272405
Labels: G.L.B.T., multiculturalism
2. It "is good" that "public opinion endorses the legal recognition of rights which arise from long-term same sex unions"?
This is an excerpt from His Eminence The Cardinal Archbishop of Sydney's weekly column in the Sydney Catholic Weekly (presumably it ran in the previous Sunday's edition of the Sydney Sunday Telegraph, too):
While not many ["Australians who declare themselves homosexual"] would choose to marry if the law was changed, public opinion endorses the legal recognition of rights which arise from long-term same sex unions.How so, Your Eminence?
This is good.
[http://www.catholicweekly.com.au/article.php?classID=3&subclassID=7&articleID=8585&class=Features&subclass=Cardinal's Comment]
Labels: G.L.B.T., George Pell, marriage
3. Prof. Somerville on euthanasia
Excerpts from an interview in the Sydney Catholic Weekly:
In 1994 the state of Oregon legalised “physician-assisted dying” with restrictions and requirements, including a psychological assessment stating that the patient is competent and is not depressed.Labels: euthanasia
“None of the psychiatrists will do that in Oregon so the ‘Death with Dignity’ people are flying in their own pro-euthanasia psychiatrists.”
[...] Between 500 and 1000 people, some of whom are mentally incompetent, die in the Netherlands each year through euthanasia without consent.
[...] “They’ve just done research in Belgium where they found that 32 per cent of doctors who had undertaken euthanasia admitted that they had done it on occasions without the person’s consent.
“That’s a third of the doctors; that’s appalling.”
In 2010 it was revealed that more than 100 Belgian nurses, mostly men, had ended the lives of patients without consent.
“When they were asked why, they said they thought it was in the patients’ best interests … the most frequent victims were people over the age of 80.”
[...] The Oregon Health Authority, which supervises the application of the Death With Dignity legislation, also decides whether patients will receive state funding for expensive medication to prolong their lives.
“Some of those drugs can cost up to $30,000 a month,” Margo says.
When the authority decides that it’s not going to provide the drug, it won’t pay for it, she said, it distributes a letter which says: “It’s not been approved; however, we would like to remind you that assisted suicide under our system is available at a very reasonable cost.”
Margo is also concerned about the connection between euthanasia and organ donation, with a recent article in a medical journal addressing the case in Belgium.
“In the latest article, four people were euthanased and their lungs were transplanted into another person.
“One of the people was a woman who was mentally ill and not physically ill at all.”
(Belgian legislation now permits euthanasia for the mentally ill.)
[...] “I was asked by a senator in the South Australian Parliament to provide a legal opinion on what they were doing with legislation and to analyse the Second Reading Speech, and I couldn’t believe what was said; it was just wrong – that the Netherlands shows us there is no slippery slope, that there had been no problem in Oregon and Belgium was completely safe!
“It was just unbelievable. This is what’s being said in Parliament.”
[http://www.catholicweekly.com.au/article.php?classID=3&subclassID=9&articleID=8592&class=Features&subclass=A conversation with]
4. A reminder of some aspects of the content and origin of Victoria's current abortion law
... critics argue that when the abortion bill was introduced in 2008, it did not have to fully adhere to the human rights charter - as is the case with all other bills - due to a clause known as section 48, which states: ''Nothing in this charter affects any law applicable to abortion or child destruction.''Labels: abortion, Victoria
[http://www.cathnews.com/article.aspx?aeid=27356]
5. Several web-pages on an under-examined aspect of the Norway killings
The Monday after the killings, I was reading the Sydney Daily Telegraph's coverage of them, the first close reading I'd done on the matter, and I was interested to read that the alleged killer's manifesto contained mention of the Knights Templar. This made me wonder whether there might be a Masonic connection involved, and as I was surfing the web that night, visiting the blogs which I usually visit, lo and behold, there at Fr. Roberts's blog was a photo of the alleged killer in the costume of his Lodge (Swedish Rite, I've read). Here's a link to Fr. Roberts's write-up of the matter:
http://kingshipofchrist.blogspot.com/2011/07/freemason-or-crusader.html
And here are some other web-pages on the matter:
http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38323
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2011/07/anders-behring-breivik-judeo-masonic.html
Labels: Anders Breivik, Freemasons
6. "Coo-ees from the Cloister up & running again"
http://coo-eesfromthecloister.blogspot.com
(That was brought to my attention by this Cath Pews post.)
Labels: blogs
7. "Malta’s parliament legalizes divorce"
http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38305
Labels: divorce, Malta, marriage
8. Two quotations (in their original French) from Pius XII. on Church-State relations
(Any Francophone readers are welcome to submit their translations in this post's combox.)
1. From an Allocution to which this web-page refers as "Ai partecipanti al primo Congresso mondiale dell'Apostolato dei Laici (14 ottobre 1951)":
Il ne faudrait pas non plus laisser passer inaperçue, ni sans en reconnaître la bienfaisante influence, l'étroite union qui, jusqu'à la révolution française, mettait en relations mutuelles, dans le monde catholique, les deux autorités établies par Dieu : l'Eglise et l'Etat. L'intimité de leurs rapports sur le terrain commun de la vie publique, créait — en général — comme une atmosphère d'esprit chrétien, qui dispensait en bonne part du travail délicat, auquel doivent, aujourd'hui, s'atteler les prêtres et les laïques pour procurer la sauvegarde et la valeur pratique de la foi.2. From an Allocution which this web-page calls the "Address Vous avez voulu to participants in the 10th International Congress of Historical Sciences (September 7, 1955)":
[AAS 43 (1951), p. 785,
http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/index_en.htm]
L'historien ne devrait pas oublier que, si l'Eglise et l'Etat connurent des heures et des années de lutte, il y eut, de Constantin le Grand jusqu'à l'époque contemporaine et même récente, des périodes tranquilles, souvent prolongées, pendant lesquelles ils collaborèrent dans une pleine compréhension à l'éducation des mêmes personnes. L'Eglise ne dissimule pas qu'elle considère en principe cette collaboration comme normale, et qu'elle regarde comme un idéal l'unité du peuple dans la vraie religion et l'unanimité d'action entre elle et l'Etat. ...Labels: Church and State, Pius XII. Pacelli
[AAS 47 (1955), p. 679,
http://www.vatican.va/archive/aas/index_en.htm]
Also available in Spanish here:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/speeches/1955/documents/hf_p-xii_spe_19550907_vous-avez-voulu_sp.html]
Reginaldvs Cantvar
Feast of St. John Mary Vianney, Confessor, and of Sts. Cyriacus, Largus, and Smaragdus, Martyrs, A.D. 2011
5 comments:
The Maurice Pinay/The Plot Against the Church blog now has a post regarding the matter of item 5:
An Observation
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/08/observation.html
The deleted comment was mine; I accidentally double-posted the first comment.
"public opinion endorses the legal recognition of rights which arise from long-term same sex unions. This is good."
If he had said simply "which arise out of long term relationships", would you have disagreed? I think there are such rights, but we do not privilege such relationships on the basis of sexual activity.
"[You] think there are such rights [as "arise out of long term relationships"]"
What are some examples of these purported rights?
Post a Comment