More evidence that too many people simply do not understand the pro-life cause

Remember when the journalist Ms Helen Pitt made the following bizarre comparison in The Sydney Morning Herald’s Good Weekend magazine?:

[Mrs. Sarah Palin's town is] a place where guns and God are treated with equal reverence; where "right to life" applies to a foetus but not to a fawn.
(my emphasis,
http://cardinalpole.blogspot.com/2008/11/fr-harris-on-death-penalty.html)

And remember when the Canadian blogger MgS made the following ludicrous non sequitur?:

Speaking of those rights [of unborn children], what do you do when the mother dies in childbirth? Charge the infant with homicide? That's the logical extrapolation of your model of fetal rights
(my emphasis,
http://crystalgaze2.blogspot.com/2008/12/base-squirmeth.html)

Now we have another piece of absurdity from abortion advocates, this time the tireless Mr. Lewis Winders at The Australian’s letters blog last Friday:

The ludicrous logical extension of your argument is that all of the trillions of children who could have been conceived throughout history should have been conceived, because they have a “right to life”.
(http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/letters/index.php/theaustralian/comments/pernicious_doctrines)

Reginaldvs Cantvar
Feast of St. Scholastica, Virgin, A.D. 2009